Pre-Registrations · Entry 3ws8g

Confirmed · Rating 9.6 / 10

Type 2 Diabetes · MI · AF × Age > 70 — ICU Mortality Miscalibration

RocSite pre-registration filed before any eICU-CRD confirmatory analysis. Cross-referenced with OSF at https://osf.io/3ws8g. Cryptographically signed evidence anchors below; replication results published on the findings dashboard.

External cross-reference · OSF
https://osf.io/3ws8g

This same pre-registration is also filed on OSF (Center for Open Science). The OSF record and this RocSite registry entry contain identical content; either can be cited for independent verification.

Note on the OSF link: The OSF account hosting osf.io/3ws8g was flagged by an automated heuristic; a Center for Open Science support request was submitted 2026-04-26. The filing content was timestamped on OSF before the flag occurred and remains intact. While that review is in progress, this RocSite registry entry is the most directly accessible canonical record. Independent verification anchors are listed in the bottom section.

The OSF URL above is the canonical reference. All published papers, manuscripts, and external citations point there — this page does not change those references.

Filing timestamp

Filed on OSF
April 22, 2026, 7:14 PM ET 2026-04-22T19:34:10 UTC
Filed prior to any eICU-CRD confirmatory data access. The MIMIC-IV cohort extract and the pre-registered analytical plan were finalized and posted before any external replication dataset was queried, eliminating the possibility of retrospective hypothesis fitting.

Evidence hashes

Three SHA-256 anchored evidence hashes were generated at filing time and recorded on OSF. They appear verbatim in the manuscripts and on the public Findings dashboard. Any reader can compare the hash on OSF (when restored) to the hashes shown below and in the papers.

Type 2 diabetes × age > 70
7d2a16e7e901e602
Acute myocardial infarction × age > 70
6bf704b3907a061b
Atrial fibrillation × age > 70
7f21bfbc3b83f069

Pre-registered content

The following plan was filed on OSF and is reproduced here verbatim from the Methods sections of the corresponding manuscripts. Nothing below was changed after the eICU-CRD confirmatory analysis was run.

Cohort inclusion criteria

  • Adult ICU admissions in MIMIC-IV v2.2 (PhysioNet credentialed access).
  • First ICU stay per hospital admission only.
  • Length of stay ≥ 6 hours (excludes transient stays not reflective of ICU care).
  • Age computed at the start of the ICU stay; stratified at age > 70 for the three primary findings, and age < 50 for the COPD comparator.
  • No exclusion based on race, ethnicity, sex, insurance, or admission source.

ICD code stacks (per condition)

  • Type 2 diabetes: ICD-9 250.x0, 250.x2; ICD-10 E11.*. Excludes type 1 (250.x1, 250.x3, E10.*) and gestational (O24.4).
  • Acute myocardial infarction: ICD-9 410.*; ICD-10 I21.*, I22.*. Index admission must be the primary diagnosis or first secondary diagnosis with billed troponin elevation.
  • Atrial fibrillation: ICD-9 427.31; ICD-10 I48.0, I48.1, I48.2, I48.91. Includes paroxysmal, persistent, chronic, and unspecified.
  • Pulmonary embolism: ICD-9 415.1*; ICD-10 I26.*.
  • Seizure: ICD-9 345.*, 780.39; ICD-10 G40.*, R56.9.
  • COPD: ICD-9 491.*, 492.*, 496; ICD-10 J44.*.

Outcome definition

In-hospital mortality. Patient discharge disposition coded as expired or death, evaluated at the hospital-admission level. Patients transferred to hospice from inpatient care are not counted as in-hospital deaths in the primary analysis (sensitivity analysis below treats hospice transfer as an event).

Analytical plan

  1. Compute observed in-hospital mortality per stratum.
  2. Compute Wilson score 95% confidence intervals on each proportion (continuity-corrected).
  3. Compute relative divergence from the published consensus estimate as (observed − published) / published × 100.
  4. Bootstrap risk difference (10,000 resamples) for the divergence point estimate on each stratum.
  5. For confirmation: re-run identical pipeline on eICU-CRD v2.0 (PhysioNet credentialed access). Confirmation requires the divergence direction to replicate and the eICU 95% CI to exclude the published consensus value.

Pre-specified sensitivity analyses

  • Hospice-as-event: count hospice transfer as in-hospital death.
  • 30-day mortality variant: use 30-day post-admission mortality in place of in-hospital, where MIMIC-IV linkage permits.
  • First-ever vs. recurrent: stratify by whether the index condition is first-ever or recurrent (where prior admission data exists).
  • Severity adjustment: repeat with SOFA at 24 h and APACHE-IVa included as covariates; report effect on point estimate.
  • Era effect: split MIMIC-IV by admission year (2010–2015 vs. 2016–2023) to test for temporal drift in observed mortality.

Decision rule (pre-specified)

A finding is labeled Confirmed only if all of: (a) MIMIC-IV divergence ≥ 50% in absolute relative terms, (b) eICU-CRD replication of direction, (c) eICU-CRD 95% CI excludes the published consensus, and (d) novelty score ≥ 0.75 from the engine's adversarial review (Advocate / Adversary / Arbiter unanimous). Findings failing any criterion remain in the Exploratory tier, single-dataset and OSF-timestamped, pending external replication.

Independent verification anchors

These anchors are external to both OSF and rocsitediscovery.com. Any reader can confirm the filing timeline by cross-referencing these external timestamps — the chain does not depend on this site or on OSF being available.

medRxiv preprint
GitHub repository
Wayback Machine snapshot
OSF (when restored)

How to verify independently: compare the evidence hashes on this page to the hashes embedded in the medRxiv preprint, the GitHub commit tree, and the Research Square submission. All three were submitted to external systems with their own timestamps. If even one external timestamp pre-dates the eICU-CRD confirmatory analysis dates, the filing date is verified independently of OSF and of this site.

FAQ

Is this the official pre-registration?
Yes. This RocSite registry entry is the canonical pre-registration record for this finding. The same content is also filed on OSF at osf.io/3ws8g as an independent cross-reference. Existing manuscripts and external citations point at the OSF URL exactly as filed; either reference resolves to the same time-stamped content.
Why does the OSF link show a spam warning right now?
The OSF account was flagged by an automated heuristic on the Center for Open Science platform; a support review request was submitted 2026-04-26 and is in progress. The flag is administrative — it does not affect the registered content, which remains intact and verifiable via the cryptographic anchors below. Once the review completes, the OSF page will display normally.
How can I independently verify the filing date?
Three independent ways. (1) Check the medRxiv preprint timestamp — preprint servers are third parties whose timestamps are not under the researcher's control. (2) Check the GitHub commit tree at the linked repository — Git commits are cryptographically chained and cannot be retro-dated without breaking the chain. (3) Check the Wayback Machine snapshot of this page — Internet Archive timestamps are entirely independent of both OSF and rocsitediscovery.com.
How is the 9.6 / 10 rating computed?
The RocSite engine scores every registered paper across five axes: Literature consistency, Internal consistency, Cross-dataset replication, Temporal stability, and Subgroup fairness. The composite is the equally-weighted mean. Auto-certification (Confirmed status) requires composite ≥ 9.0 and unanimous Advocate / Adversary / Arbiter consensus. See the methodology page for the complete scoring spec.